What should I buy Android terminal between the new presented?

Byadmin

During the MWC 2012, we saw many interesting terminals that have been analyzed over the past month. The level of these new mobiles is very high, yet is very equalized between different manufacturers. All manufacturers have a phone in their range that could easily be considered the best in the market for several reasons. It is then the question that arises, who bought the mobile from all the newly submitted?

In this article we will show the pros and cons of each flagship presented by the best manufacturers Androidcompared to its rivals . The aim is to give you an idea of what is best suited for you and this is very easy to see, if the pros are essential for you and those who are against the terminal will seem insignificant , then you know that mobile is perfectly designed for you . It sometimes happens that the decision gets a bit more difficult when all these phones have anything against that is essential for you and you have to put these disadvantages in the balance but in any case, this analysis will help .

Sony Xperia S

For:

  • It is a terminal that is already available on the market, so if you need it immediately because you have broken yours, this side has the advantage.
  • The camera of 12 megapixel camera with Exmor-R sensor makes the Xperia S the best phone in terms of the photographic section. If you love the pictures, this may be a turning point for the purchase of this terminal.
  • The striking design of the other phones has received very good reviews and that is why it can be a major asset to our purchase.
  • The screen resolution of 4.3-inch HD is smaller than the other major terminals. This is a differentiating factor that may attract some customers who see the big screens as unnecessary.

Against:

  • Its dual-core processor is not at the level of the competition and commitment to the four cores. Although currently not a major disadvantage, before too long, the double nuclei begin to fall behind and be recognized as midrange terminals.
  • The operating system version is 2.3 and Sony reports that it takes longer than they thought to update this terminal to the latest version of Android. It is annoying to see large terminals that go to market with an outdated version compared to their potential.
  • It has a microSD card slot, which can be a problem for those who have their own cards that are passed from one phone to another and you’d have to leave in oblivion with this terminal.

HTC One X

For:

  • The brand itself is a plus and not a setback for HTC, with quality materials and optimization of customization. Sense 4.0 is the best market in many ways.
  • The screen of 4.7 inches HD resolution and Gorilla Glass is one of the largest in the market. It is the opposite characteristic of the Xperia screen S, which is directed to the public who enjoys the big screen.
  • The Tegra 3 processor, quad-core 1.5 GHz, is one of the best on the market, especially for its dedicated core to save battery.
  • The camera, despite falling behind Xperia S in terms of megapixels, is very well optimized by the software of HTC and is more powerful than it may seem at first glance.

Against:

  • Again, I must mention that you do not have a microSD card slot. But otherwise, it is true that the integration of this terminal with Dropbox and 32GB of internal memory somewhat supplements this drawback.
  • The 1800 mAh battery seems like a case of a mobile with a screen resolution of 4.7 inches and HD. Perhaps if we give it a go hurry-intensive in terms of battery at the end of the day.
  • The size can also be a problem for many users who find seem too big.

LG Optimus 4X HD

In Favor:

  • The screen is as large as the HTC One X, but comparisons have been observed that fail to be of such quality. In any case, s or HD resolution is not far behind.
  • Your processor, Tegra 3, already mentioned above, is above most of Android and is why it is important to note.
  • Its 2150 mAh battery is surely one of his strongest assets, as such a battery, its thickness is at 8.9 mm.
  • It has a microSD card slot, together with 16 GB of internal memory.

Against:

  • The most important factor against this terminal is that it is an LG. This brand has many unhappy customers because the support for its terminals is left behind in updates. On the other hand, recently, LG has not been more remarkable marks with their terminals.
  • The size, like the HTC One X, can be a problem for some customers.

Huawei Ascend D Quad

For:

  • As money is one of the best terminals by far. Its price is anticipated to be at least 100 euros less than its main competitors named above.
  • It has a microSD card slot.
  • Your processor, manufactured by Huawei with 4 cores at 1.5 GHz, appears to offer even better performance than the Nvidia Tegra 3.
  • Almost a native Android version, thanks to the little customization, Huawei offers a great feeling to moving between their menus. On the other hand is likely to receive future updates before and will not need much optimization of personalization.

Against:

  • The brand Huawei is a double-edged sword because on one side, it can turn off many customers by not being well-known. On the other hand, has offers to their former terminals have been good and as I mentioned before, in terms of money are almost insurmountable.
  • You do not have the NFC technology for this much betting.
  • The internal memory is only 8 GB.
  • The 1800 mAh battery is not a disaster, but it could be improved. In any case, will also appear an alternative version called Ascend D Quad XL with the only difference that it will have more battery at the expense of a few millimeters in thickness.

Having the main contenders for the title of best Android phone we need to recap a bit .

  • The Xperia S would gain in terms of differentiation , with a different design and a powerful camera moves away from the other devices.
  • The One X would gain in quality is a very powerful terminal with very good material that has superior support to others by the brand.
  • The LG Optimus HD 4x gain in terms of general features , is the most balanced in various ways such as power, screen and battery.
  • The Huawei Ascend D Quad win in terms of money , despite being a terminal with a price lower than others, not has little to envy.

I should mention that these are the terminals that I think are above the rest, as they could be the terminals of brands such as ZTE and Motorola. Also, mention that one of the main contenders for the title of best Android mobile 2012, the Samsung Galaxy S III, is not on the list because it has not been submitted yet.

I will probably update this summer my terminal and regardless of the Galaxy SIII still very possible for me to stay with the Ascend D Quad because I think it is the most suitable for me. In any case, everyone will have their reasons for choosing one or another and I hope you share them with us.